SOTEN WORK REVISITED
Haynes
summarises the present thinking regarding the Sōten group of Japanese
sword guards when he states, in his Index
of Japanese Sword Fittings and Associated Artists, that work by Sōten
I, the first artist of the
Sōten I, as once
he was thought to be.
The work of Sōten II, the son
of the former artist, is difficult to distinguish from that of his father. He probably made some openwork pieces, both
in iron and shakudō, but not
featuring warrior subjects. The
existence of a third generation is now questioned and, if such an artist
existed, his work cannot be distinguished from the many students and followers
who signed their work as being by Sōten.
Haynes quotes Sōten I to have
been aged 72 years in 1750, while giving the dates of the nidai as ca 1750-1775. But did the former artist really father a son
at the age of 75?
There
are two ryō-hitsu, within raised rims, and there are indications
on the nakago-hitsu of its mounting
on a blade. It is inscribed on the
obverse SOHEISHI NYUDO SOTEN SUKE KORE and, on the reverse, OMI SHU HIKONE (NO)JU.
This
tsuba featured in
402
Three,
sentoku,
inlaid with a Chinese sage in a boat watching the
moon, signed: Hiroyuki;
copper, with hawk and monkey, signed:
Shigeyoshi; shakudo,
the Seven Sages in the Bamboo Grove, signed:
Soheishi Niudo Soten.
3
The
three tsuba sold for the sum of £1.14s.
The
Seven Sages of the Bamboo Grove are described by Joly,
each with their associated legend, on page 309 of his Legend in Japanese Art. They
comprise the following 'poets, literati and convivial immortals':
1.
Genshiki, with his boy attendant, and carrying
a staff;
2.
Genkan, his nephew, with fan and staff;
3.
Keiko, carrying a book;
4.
Kioshin, with an unrolled makimono;
5.
Oju;
6.
Santo, shown as an old man with a staff; and
7.
Riurei.
In
spite of the fine detail on this tsuba, it is not possible to identify all of
these figures, but two fans, the boy attendant and an unrolled makimono are all
clearly shown.
The Kinko Meikan, on
pages 519 and 520, illustrates five tsuba attributed to Sōten,
but in no case does the author make any distinction between the two
masters. The reason for this omission
may be related to Haynes' assertion that 'most of those pieces assigned to the
second generation are examples that are thought inferior to the work of the
first generation' — a suggestion supported by the fact that, in the former
book, Sōten's work is graded as varying between Jokō and Ryōkō.
WAY
43 6 1933
The
inscriptions illustrated of the obverse and reverse of the first of these tsuba
are, with one exception, identical to those on the author's tsuba. In this illustration, as in a further two of
the remaining four, the kanji for
'shi' in Soheishi is rendered in such a way as to
replace its initial horizontal stroke by a lozenge-shaped component; this is a
feature said to be common to most — but not all — genuine Sōten
work.
On
pages 62-63 and 64-65 of his Catalogue of
the Dr W Fahrenhorst Collection, Inami Tomihike illustrates two
tsuba that are attributed to Sōten. The first of these is very similar, both in
its design and its description, to the one being studied, while the second is
almost identical. On both of these tsuba
the character for 'shi' in Soheishi is written in the
conventional manner of the three-stroke kanji,
with a horizontal first stroke.
All
certified Sōten pieces appear to be tsuba, and
no certified smaller mounts are known to the author. This causes him to view the existence of the fuchi-gashira
WAY 172 29 1936 with somewhat mixed feelings, since it casts into some doubt the
suggestion that the tsuba may be the work of the second Sōten
master. Surprisingly, since the two
items were acquired from two completely different sources, separated by an
interval of four years, they are clearly by the same hand. The shakudō is of the same high quality on all three
pieces; the recesses enclosing the bamboo are a mirror of those on the tsuba;
and the seven figures — Genshiki's attendant is not
included on these smaller pieces — all have similar features and identical
decoration on their clothing. The fuchi and kashira are slightly
more decorative than is the tsuba in that their makimono are gilded in their entirety rather than having linear
gilding, and there are occasional areas of gold yakitsuke on the trunks of the
bamboo. Neither the fuchi
nor the kashira is inscribed.
WAY
172 29 1936
This fuchi-gashira was purchased in 1936 by WA Young from the
shop owned by GG Davies and Kenneth Horn: it was previously a part of both the
In
considering the possible provenance of these two artefacts, three options are
available to us, as follows:
The
marked similarity between the two examples makes it extremely unlikely that two
different artists were involved in their production. I am of the personal belief that, while the
tsuba would probably be granted a kanteisho as being genuine Sōten
work, the existence of the fuchi-gashira suggests
that they may all be high quality copies, possibly by one of the two artists of
the Nomura school who were named Kanenori.
Dr. John Lissenden and Shibui Swords
Return To Study Guide
Tsuba Gallery
Home Page
E-MAIL